Ad
related to: bank charges court case summary los angeles by name- County Court Records
Easily Search Court Records Online
Just Enter A Name & Choose A State
- Court Case Records
Get Info On Any Public Court Case
Reveal Incriminating Details Today!
- Criminal Court Records
See If Anyone Has Been To Court
Browse Up To Date Court Records
- Public Court Records
See Public Public Court Records
Millions Of Citizens. Search Today!
- County Court Records
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Full case name: Discover Bank v. Superior Court of Los Angeles; Christopher Boehr, Real Party in Interest: Citation(s) 36 Cal. 4th 148, 113 P.3d 1100: Holding; An arbitration agreement with a class-action waiver was unenforceable on the grounds of unconscionability: Court membership; Chief Justice: Ronald M. George: Associate Justices
The Supreme Court remanded Miller's case back to the Fifth Circuit. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. dissented, identifying that a similar case, Burrows v. Superior Court, [5] had been decided in the California Supreme Court that ruled that bank records were protected under the Fourth Amendment, in a manner consistent with California Bankers Ass'n v.
Chris Brown (left) appears in court with his attorney Mark Geragos (right) for a probation violation hearing on March 17, 2014, in Los Angeles, Calif Brown pleaded guilty to the assault from the ...
City of Los Angeles Dep't of Water & Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702 (1978) is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that employers cannot charge women more for pension benefits, despite women living longer than men, on average, and therefore receiving more retirement benefits.
An important sidelight was the filing of insider trading charges against whistleblower Dirks. The ensuing case of Raymond L. Dirks v. Securities and Exchange Commission went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court where Dirks was finally acquitted. The case has been termed historic in helping to define insider trading, as well as the treatment of ...
Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest, 4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018) was a landmark case handed down by the California Supreme Court on April 30, 2018. A class of drivers for a same-day delivery company, Dynamex, claimed that they were misclassified as independent contractors and thus unlawfully deprived of ...
In a tentative settlement, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power has agreed to repay customers who were charged too much for sewer service from May 2016 to June 2022.
City of Los Angeles v. Lyons , 461 U.S. 95 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the plaintiff, Adolph Lyons, lacked standing to challenge the Los Angeles city police department's use of chokeholds .
Ad
related to: bank charges court case summary los angeles by name