enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royscot_Trust_Ltd_v_Rogerson

    It examines the Misrepresentation Act 1967 and addresses the extent of damages available under s 2(1) for negligent misrepresentation. The court controversially decided that under the Act, the appropriate measure of damages was the same as that for common law fraud, or damages for all losses flowing from a misrepresentation, even if unforeseeable.

  3. Tort of deceit - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tort_of_deceit

    The leading case in English law is Derry v.Peek, [2] which was decided before the development of the law on negligent misstatement. In Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v.Heller & Partners Ltd it was decided that people who make statements which they ought to have known were untrue because they were negligent, can in some circumstances, to restricted groups of claimants be liable to make compensation for ...

  4. Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heilbut,_Symons_&_Co_v...

    It held that a non-fraudulent misrepresentation gave no right to damages. This was decided decades before Hedley Byrne v Heller, where damages for negligent misrepresentation were introduced in English law, and, thus, it would today be regarded as wrongly decided under the tort of negligent misrepresentation.

  5. Derry v Peek - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derry_v_Peek

    Derry v Peek [1889] UKHL 1 is a case on English contract law, fraudulent misstatement, and the tort of deceit. Derry v Peek established a 3-part test for fraudulent misrepresentation, [1] whereby the defendant is fraudulent if he: (i) knows the statement to be false, [2] or (ii) does not believe in the statement, [3] or (iii) is reckless as to ...

  6. Beck v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beck_v._Ohio

    Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 (1964), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning evidence obtained as part of an unlawful arrest. Reversing the Ohio Supreme Court's decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Ohio police arrested defendant without probable cause, so the criminally-punishable evidence found on his person during an incidental search was inadmissible.

  7. Misrepresentation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misrepresentation

    Negligent misstatement is not strictly part of the law of misrepresentation, but is a tort based upon the 1964 obiter dicta in Hedley Byrne v Heller [72] where the House of Lords found that a negligently-made statement (if relied upon) could be actionable provided a "special relationship" existed between the parties.

  8. Law enforcement have failed hundreds of missing Ohioans and ...

    www.aol.com/law-enforcement-failed-hundreds...

    Of the 366 Ohio children the state listed as missing a year or more, law enforcement failed to enter 327, or 89% of those missing kids, into the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System ...

  9. Police misconduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_misconduct

    Police misconduct is inappropriate conduct and illegal actions taken by police officers in connection with their official duties. Types of misconduct include among others: sexual offences, coerced false confession, intimidation, false arrest, false imprisonment, falsification of evidence, spoliation of evidence, police perjury, witness tampering, police brutality, police corruption, racial ...