enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Brutus Hamilton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brutus_Hamilton

    Brutus was also a writer and poet, and a collection of his letters was published in 1975. Brutus Hamilton died in Berkeley, California, on December 28, 1970. In 1974 he was inducted into the National Track and Field Hall of Fame. [4] Earlier in 1950 he was selected as Missouri’s Greatest Amateur Athlete. [1]

  3. How a Supreme Court ruling led to Gavin Newsom’s order on ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-ruling-led-gavin...

    “This is going to be a harmful policy for everyone,” Eric Tars, policy director at the National Homelessness Law Center, which opposed the court’s ruling, said of Newsom’s order.

  4. Public employees cannot use labor law to sue employers ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/controversial-labor-law-doesnt...

    The California Supreme Court ruling curtails the ability of public employees in the state to seek help from the courts in labor disputes. Public employees cannot use labor law to sue employers ...

  5. Horne v. Department of Agriculture - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horne_v._Department_of...

    Horne v. Department of Agriculture, 569 U.S. 513 (2013) ("Horne I"); 576 U.S. 351 (2015) ("Horne II"), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court issued two decisions regarding the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

  6. California Supreme Court orders Taxpayer Protection Act off ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-supreme-court-orders...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Federalist No. 78 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_No._78

    Brutus took the position that the Constitution should adopt the English system in toto (with minor modifications); Hamilton defended the present system. Several scholars believe that the case of Rutgers v. Waddington "was a template for the interpretive approach he [Hamilton] adopted in Federalist 78." [1] [2] [3]

  8. California court ruling could threaten key source of funding ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-court-ruling-could...

    A California judge says a nearly 65-year-old law does not give the state permission to borrow the billions of dollars it would need to build a large water project, a decision that could threaten a ...

  9. FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2009) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_v._Fox_Television...

    Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502 (2009), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that upheld regulations of the Federal Communications Commission that ban "fleeting expletives" on television broadcasts, finding they were not arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. [1]