enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. SOX 404 top–down risk assessment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOX_404_top–down_risk...

    In financial auditing of public companies in the United States, SOX 404 top–down risk assessment (TDRA) is a financial risk assessment performed to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX 404). Under SOX 404, management must test its internal controls; a TDRA is used to determine the scope of such testing. It is also ...

  3. Continuous monitoring - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_monitoring

    A Financial Executives International (FEI) March 2005 survey indicated it could cost an average of $4.36 million for a company to test for and ensure year-one compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 404. [3] Continuous monitoring typically includes solutions that address the three operational disciplines known as continuous audit

  4. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_of_Sponsoring...

    As part of the changes of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, public companies in the United States are required to use a system of internal controls in order to evaluate the effectiveness of their own financial reporting, and to report on the results of that evaluation to their investors in their annual financial statements. [4]

  5. Sarbanes–Oxley Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SarbanesOxley_Act

    The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 is a United States federal law that mandates certain practices in financial record keeping and reporting for corporations.The act, Pub. L. 107–204 (text), 116 Stat. 745, enacted July 30, 2002, also known as the "Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act" (in the Senate) and "Corporate and Auditing Accountability, Responsibility, and ...

  6. Information technology controls - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_technology...

    Piazza, Peter. "IT security requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley." Security Management June 2004: 40(1). "Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404: An overview of PCAOB's requirement." KPMG. April 2004. "Sarbanes-Oxley Spending in 2004 More Than Expected: Spending for section 404 compliance averaged $4.4 million in 2004, a survey finds." InformationWeek March 22 ...

  7. Internal control - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_control

    Internal control procedures reduce process variation, leading to more predictable outcomes. Internal control is a key element of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) of 1977 and the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, which required improvements in internal

  8. Control self-assessment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_self-assessment

    In 2007 the United States implemented the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In order to comply with section 404 of the Act the company had to perform a top down risk assessment which necessitated the production of an "internal control report" that affirmed "the responsibility of management for establishing and maintaining an adequate internal control ...

  9. Entity-level control - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entity-Level_Control

    As a result of several accounting and auditing scandals, congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of the act requires company management to assess and report on the effectiveness of the company's internal control .