Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Examples of jurisdictional errors include ... a matter or making a decision or order of a kind which wholly or partly lies outside the theoretical limits of its ...
(a) the constitutionalisation of review for jurisdictional error; [Note 2] [Note 3] (b) the nature of jurisdictional error; [Note 4] (c) the consequences of jurisdictional error; [Note 5] and (d) the differences in this area of law between administrative bodies and courts. [Note 6]
The High Court, in a unanimous decision, allowed Kirk's appeal. The Court held that the provisions in the Industrial Relations Act that restricted the Supreme Court's jurisdiction to review the commission's decision were constitutionally invalid.
Huggins v. Boyd, Georgia Court of Appeals 2010 (304 Ga. App. 563) In this case involving a permanent protective order prohibiting Jonathan Huggins from stalking Karen Boyd, Huggins appealed the trial court's denial of his motion to set aside the order, arguing that the trial court had no personal jurisdiction over him. Because it was undisputed ...
An order can be as simple as setting a date for trial or as complex as restructuring contractual relationships by and between many corporations in a multi-jurisdictional dispute. It may be a final order (one that concludes the court action), or an interim order (one during the action). Most orders are written, and are signed by the judge.
Judicial misconduct occurs when a judge acts in ways that are considered unethical or otherwise violate the judge's obligations of impartial conduct.. Actions that can be classified as judicial misconduct include: conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts (as an extreme example: "falsification of facts" at summary judgment); using the ...
Arizonans have been required to provide citizenship documents to obtain a driver's license since 1996. Years later, voters approved a ballot measure that mandated new voters prove their ...
Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007), is a Supreme Court of the United States case in which the Court determined that the federal courts of appeals lack jurisdiction to hear habeas appeals that are filed late, even if the district court said the petitioner had additional time to file.