Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Human rights in Thailand have long been a contentious issue. The country was among the first to sign the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 and seemed committed to upholding its stipulations; in practice, however, those in power have often abused the human rights of the Thai nation with impunity.
The cabinet (42: Prem Tinsulanonda 3 March 1980 – 30 April 1983) passed a resolution in September 1992, to establish a national organization to protect human rights. The national human rights commission was eventually mandated in Article 199 and 200 of the constitution adopted in October 1997, and formally constituted in July 2001. [4]
Thailand is key transit route, host and final destination for refugees seeking asylum in southeast Asia and Australia. [2] During the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) session in May 2016, various human rights issues including detention of refugee and asylum seeking children were reported. [3]
A prominent Thai human rights lawyer was convicted on Tuesday of insulting the monarchy and sentenced to four years in prison, the first conviction under a controversial law guarding the royal ...
Other issues include the Singapore Tourism Board organising a Songkran festival in Singapore without the endorsement of either Thai expats in Singapore, or sponsorship from the Thai authorities. [30] Singapore was accused of "stealing 'our' (Thailand's) Songkran", [ 31 ] [ failed verification ] with Thai officials threatening lawsuits.
Thai human rights activists (1 C, 27 P) F. Freedom of expression in Thailand (2 C, 1 P) H. Human rights organizations based in Thailand (8 P) L. LGBTQ rights in ...
In its annual report in January 2015, Human Rights Watch said military rule had sent human rights in Thailand into "a freefall". [22] The victims said that they were taken out of their house and detained in the military base.
The 2010 World Report from Human Rights Watch highlighted escalating human rights abuses throughout Thailand, [155] with the south reflecting overall policies against individual human rights. Sharply increased powers for police and the military were accompanied by a perceived lack of accountability.