Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, 574 U.S. 27 (2014), was a unanimous decision by the United States Supreme Court, ruling that time spent by workers waiting to undergo anti-employee theft security screenings is not "integral and indispensable" to their work, and thus not compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk 574 U.S. 37 (2014) Fair Labor Standards Act • Portal-to-Portal Act • compensation for postwork antitheft screening of employees
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
The US Supreme Court rules 9–0 (Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk) in favor of Amazon.com Inc. that employees are not entitled to be paid for the time they spend undergoing security checks after their shifts. The Pirate Bay website goes offline after Swedish police seize its servers. (The Next Web)
Integrity testing for employment selection became popular during the 1980s. [2] Human Resources personnel found integrity tests were an improvement over polygraph tests. Polygraph tests were no longer able to be used for screening of most future employees in the United States due to the Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 (EPPA). [2]
A person who frankly failed to live up to professional standards in pretty much every way that an employee could fail.” And he marched in a collection of HSBC employees—Suzy White, Mike Karam, Pablo Pizzimbono—to back him up. Everything Mike believed was evidence of mistreatment, Jackson recast as proof of his cravenness.
However, organizations have to ensure that the data they have uphold integrity and are quality data. While HR systems is one way of obtaining metrics, many organizations because of lack of resources or time, or simply because they don't know where to begin can enlist the help of a retention specialist or purchase metric systems designed solely ...
The Integrity Inventory (stylized as I 2), is a nationally normed entry-level personnel selection tool that incorporates employment integrity testing.It was developed by industrial organizational psychologist Mark Tawney, Ph.D., Principal and Vice President of IOS, Inc., or Industrial/Organizational Solutions Inc, referred to as IOS in the 2009 United States Supreme Court case, Ricci v.