Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Criticism is the construction of a judgement about the negative or positive qualities of someone or something. Criticism can range from impromptu comments to a written detailed response. [1] Criticism falls into several overlapping types including "theoretical, practical, impressionistic, affective, prescriptive, or descriptive". [2]
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 28 December 2024. Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Wikipedia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR ...
Wikipedia uses a collaborative software known as wiki that facilitates the creation and development of articles. Although some highly publicized problems have called attention to Wikipedia's editorial process, they have done little to dampen public use of the resource, which is one of the most-visited sites on the Internet.
Aesthetic criticism is a part of aesthetics concerned with critically judging beauty and ugliness, tastefulness and tastelessness, style and fashion, meaning and quality of design—and issues of human sentiment and affect (the evoking of pleasure and pain, likes and dislikes).
No undue weight should be given to criticism. Some policies and guidelines that help determine the amount and presentation (or: weight) of criticism in an article: WP:BALASPS: the weight a Wikipedia article gives to criticism of its subject should be proportionate to the overall weight of such criticisms in reliable sources on the subject of the article.
Ideological bias on Wikipedia, especially in its English-language edition, has been the subject of academic analysis and public criticism of the project. Questions relate to whether its content is biased due to the political , religious, or other ideologies its volunteer editors may adhere to.
Even if criticism appears actually or possibly well founded, it may be expressed in an obnoxious manner, such as publishing essentially the same piece of criticism over and over and over again (e.g., repeating stories about the Seigenthaler biography hoax incident) in many frequent articles in a bid to browbeat the community into doing ...
Wikipediocracy is a website for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia. [2] [3] Its members have brought information about Wikipedia's controversies to the attention of the media. The site was founded in March 2012 by users of Wikipedia Review, [4] another site dedicated to criticism of Wikipedia. [5] [6]