Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Gun rights advocates claim that the Court in Miller ruled that the Second Amendment protected the right to keep arms that are part of "ordinary military equipment." [ 77 ] They also claim that the Court did not consider the question of whether the sawed-off shotgun in the case would be an applicable weapon for personal defense, instead looking ...
Miller (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment did not protect weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia". [16] [17] In the 21st century, the amendment has been subjected to renewed academic inquiry and judicial interest. [17] In District of Columbia v.
Trump has spoken repeatedly before the NRA membership but mostly in vague terms about how the Second Amendment is “under siege” — even as gun rights grew stronger. Trump’s most memorable ...
It was only a year ago that the Supreme Court issued a landmark Second Amendment opinion that expanded gun rights nationwide and established that firearms rules must be consistent with the nation ...
All were adamantly against any reform to America's gun laws, including raising the legal age to buy a gun, strengthening background checks or limiting assault-style rifles similar to the one the ...
[5] [6] Concerns regarding the economic impact of significant deficit reductions forecast for 2013 (dubbed the "fiscal cliff") were addressed by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which included: a) the expiration of the Bush tax cuts for only the top 1% of income earners; b) the end of the Obama payroll tax cuts; and c) a sequester (cap ...
A new Trump administration could change course on Supreme Court cases over transgender care for minors and untraceable "ghost guns." Supreme Court whiplash: What Trump's win means for guns and ...
Upheld a 1994 law intended to protect victims of domestic violence. The law prohibits people who are under domestic violence restraining orders from having guns. The 8-1 decision reversed an appellate ruling striking down the law based on the Supreme Court's 2022 decision expanding gun rights.