Ads
related to: does not really matter what god needs but makes it truedawn.orlandobible.org has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
rcg.org has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
No morality without God: If all morality is a matter of God's will, then if God does not exist, there is no morality. This is the thought captured in the slogan (often attributed to Dostoevsky) "If God does not exist, everything is permitted." Divine command theorists disagree over whether this is a problem for their view or a virtue of their view.
Finally, he discusses how both religious experience and belief in God is, and has always been, normative among humans: [102] people do not need to prove the existence of God. If there is no need to prove, Hinman argues, and the Trace of God (for instance, the impact of mystical experiences on them), belief in God is rationally warranted.
I suppose it is true in a sense that a man can be a fundamental sceptic, but he cannot be anything else: certainly not even a defender of fundamental scepticism. If a man feels that all the movements of his own mind are meaningless, then his mind is meaningless, and he is meaningless; and it does not mean anything to attempt to discover his ...
Omnipotence, they say, does not mean that God can do anything at all but, rather, that he can do anything that is logically possible; he cannot, for instance, make a square circle. Likewise, God cannot make a being greater than himself, because he is, by definition, the greatest possible being. God is limited in his actions to his nature.
The universe does exist at time t at which there is no earlier time where the universe existed. Therefore, the universe has a cause. Philosopher Ben Waters has also argued that the Kalam cosmological argument does not require a commitment to the A-theory. [91]
Second, Bahnsen conflates "atheism" with "materialism" and has really presented an argument against materialism, not an argument for Christianity. Third, Bahnsen believed that the laws of logic, laws of science, and laws of morality are abstract objects , but Christianity arguably underdetermines the relationship between God and abstract objects.
Al-Ghazali disputed this as incompatible with the concept of God's untrammelled free will as taught in Al-Ghazali's Asharite theology. [27] He further argued that God's free choice can be shown by the arbitrary nature of the exact size of the universe or the time of its creation. [27] Peter Adamson offered several more possible lines of criticism.
For the God who created and upholds the universe was not created – he is eternal. He was not 'made' and therefore subject to the laws that science discovered; it was he who made the universe with its laws. Indeed, that fact constitutes the fundamental distinction between God and the universe. The universe came to be, God did not.
Ads
related to: does not really matter what god needs but makes it truedawn.orlandobible.org has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
rcg.org has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month