enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. California v. Acevedo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_v._Acevedo

    California v. Acevedo , 500 U.S. 565 (1991), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court , which interpreted the Carroll doctrine to provide one rule to govern all automobile searches. The Court stated, "The police may search an automobile and the containers within it where they have probable cause to believe contraband or evidence is ...

  3. United States v. Ross - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Ross

    United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982), was a search and seizure case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States.The high court was asked to decide if a legal warrantless search of an automobile allows closed containers found in the vehicle (specifically, in the trunk) to be searched as well.

  4. Motor vehicle exception - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle_exception

    The area can encompass the entire vehicle, including the trunk. The motor vehicle exception, in addition to allowing officers to search the vehicle, allows officers to search any containers found inside the vehicle that could contain the evidence or contraband for which they are searching (United States v. Ross). The objects searched do not ...

  5. United States v. Chadwick - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Chadwick

    United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 (1977), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that, absent exigency, the warrantless search of double-locked luggage just placed in the trunk of a parked vehicle is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception.

  6. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Burger Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    California v. Prysock: 453 U.S. 355 (1981) Phrasing of the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona: New York v. Belton: 453 U.S. 454 (1981) scope of a lawful search incident to the arrest of a passenger in an automobile includes things inside the passenger compartment Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San Diego: 453 U.S. 490 (1981)

  7. She endured a traumatic cavity search when visiting a ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/she-endured-traumatic-cavity...

    She endured a traumatic cavity search when visiting a California prison. Now she won a $5.6-million settlement. Terry Castleman. September 9, 2024 at 9:00 PM.

  8. South Dakota v. Opperman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota_v._Opperman

    Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 (1976), elaborated on the community caretaking doctrine. Under the Fourth Amendment , "unreasonable" searches and seizures are forbidden. In addition to their law-enforcement duties, the police must engage in what the court has termed a community caretaking role, including such duties as removing obstructions from ...

  9. Discover the best free online games at AOL.com - Play board, card, casino, puzzle and many more online games while chatting with others in real-time.