Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
California v. Acevedo , 500 U.S. 565 (1991), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court , which interpreted the Carroll doctrine to provide one rule to govern all automobile searches. The Court stated, "The police may search an automobile and the containers within it where they have probable cause to believe contraband or evidence is ...
California v. Acevedo: 500 U.S. 565 (1991) police may search a container in a car without a warrant if they have probable cause to believe it contains contraband Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company: 500 U.S. 614 (1991) Batson's prohibition on race-based use of peremptory challenges applies in civil trials Connecticut v. Doehr: 501 U.S. 1 (1991)
The motor vehicle exception was first established by the United States Supreme Court in 1925, in Carroll v. United States. [1] [2] The motor vehicle exception allows officers to search a vehicle without a search warrant if they have probable cause to believe that evidence or contraband is in the vehicle. [3]
(The Center Square) – Former Illinois State Rep. Eddie Acevedo's testimony in a high-profile corruption case got off to a bumpy start Monday with a contempt warning from the judge. Judge John ...
New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a police officer has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, the officer may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile.
Kyle Dumble, 27, was convicted of murder following 24-year-old Jack Field's death on Nov. 18, 2023
In a separate case in 2022, Acevedo was sentenced to six months in prison for tax evasion. Acevedo required to testify at Madigan trial A judge has ruled that former state Rep. Eddie Acevedo is ...
California v. Texas , 593 U.S. 659 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the constitutionality of the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA), colloquially known as Obamacare. It was the third such challenge to the ACA seen by the Supreme Court since its enactment.