Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
California v. Acevedo , 500 U.S. 565 (1991), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court , which interpreted the Carroll doctrine to provide one rule to govern all automobile searches. The Court stated, "The police may search an automobile and the containers within it where they have probable cause to believe contraband or evidence is ...
California, 453 U.S. 420 decision in July 1981, overruled by the United States v. Ross , 456 U.S. 798 decision in June 1982. There have been 16 decisions which have simultaneously overruled more than one earlier decision; of these, three have simultaneously overruled four decisions each: the statutory law regarding habeas corpus decision Hensley v.
California v. Acevedo (1991) (in part) Chadwick , 433 U.S. 1 (1977), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court , which held that, absent exigency , the warrantless search of double-locked luggage just placed in the trunk of a parked vehicle is a violation of the Fourth Amendment and not justified under the automobile exception .
But it's dangerous to do so, Bennett added, as passengers can get hit by road debris or, in a worst-case scenario, be seriously injured in an accident. Slow-moving parades are safe due to speeds ...
New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a police officer has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, the officer may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile.
(The Center Square) – Former Illinois State Rep. Eddie Acevedo's testimony in a high-profile corruption case got off to a bumpy start Monday with a contempt warning from the judge. Judge John ...
They unsuccessfully sought to take the case directly to the California Supreme Court and were left to pursue the case in a lower court. Then, in a sweeping decision in August 2021, Alameda County ...
B. Bailey v. United States (2013) Beck v. Ohio; Bell v. Wolfish; Berger v. New York; Birchfield v. North Dakota; Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents; Board of Education v.