enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Baker v. Carr - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker_v._Carr

    Baker v. Carr , 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment 's equal protection clause, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Corn Products Refining Co. v. Commissioner: 350 U.S. 46 (1955) Hedging futures gains are ordinary if on raw materials United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp. 350 U.S. 332 (1956) contracts under the Natural Gas Act of 1938: Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co. 350 U.S. 348 (1956) contracts under the Federal Power Act ...

  4. Political question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_question

    Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 433 (1939) – Mode of amending federal Constitution is a political question. Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946) – Apportionment of Congressional districts is a political question (Overruled by Baker v. Carr). Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) – Apportionment of state legislatures is not a political ...

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving standing

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Massachusetts v. EPA: 2007: States have standing to sue the EPA to enforce their views of federal law, in this case, the view that carbon dioxide was an air pollutant under the Clean Air Act. Cited Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co. as precedent. 5–4 Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation: 2007: Bond v. United States: 2011

  6. Wesberry v. Sanders - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesberry_v._Sanders

    Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that districts in the United States House of Representatives must be approximately equal in population. Along with Baker v. Carr (1962) and Reynolds v.

  7. Colegrove v. Green - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colegrove_v._Green

    However, in Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) the United States Supreme Court distinguished the Colegrove decision holding that malapportionment claims under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment were not exempt from judicial review under Article IV, Section 4, as the equal protection issue in this case was separate from any ...

  8. Charles Evans Whittaker - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Evans_Whittaker

    Charles Evans Whittaker (February 22, 1901 – November 26, 1973) was an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1957 to 1962. After working in private practice in Kansas City, Missouri, he was nominated for the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

  9. Talk:Baker v. Carr - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Baker_v._Carr

    The Luther v Borden article correctly states that it is the law to this day - which is to say the Guarantee Clause is non-justiciable. Colegrove v Green simply relied on Luther, because there the appellant argued the districting violated the Guarantee Clause. The Colegrove article says it was overruled by Baker v Carr. As a practical matter ...