Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For example, plugins can add, replace, or even remove middle-end passes operating on Gimple representations. [70] Several GCC plugins have already been published, notably: The Python plugin, which links against libpython, and allows one to invoke arbitrary Python scripts from inside the compiler. The aim is to allow GCC plugins to be written in ...
In practice, Clang is a drop-in replacement for GCC. [25] Clang's developers aim to reduce memory footprint and increase compiling speed compared to other compilers, such as GCC. In October 2007, they report that Clang compiled the Carbon libraries more than twice as fast as GCC, while using about one-sixth GCC's memory and disk space. [26]
[3] [4] Nuitka initially was designed to produce C++ code, but current versions produce C source code using only those features of C11 that are shared by C++03, enabling further compilation to a binary executable format by modern C and C++ compilers including gcc, clang, MinGW, or Microsoft Visual C++. It accepts Python code compatible with ...
Clang finished support for C++14 in 3.4 though under the standard name c++1y, and made C++14 the default C++ standard in Clang 6. [24] GCC finished support for C++14 in GCC 5, and made C++14 the default C++ standard in GCC 6. [25] Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 has implemented "almost all" C++14 features. [26]
However, GCC's nested functions, unlike blocks, must not be called after the containing scope has exited, as that would result in undefined behavior. GCC-style nested functions currently use dynamic creation of executable thunks on most architectures when taking the address of the nested function. On most architectures (including X86), these ...
[6] [4] CMake was inspired by multiple contemporary tools. pcmaker – developed by Ken Martin and others to support building the Visualization Toolkit (VTK) – converted Unix Make files into NMake files for building on Windows. [4] gmake supported Unix and Windows compilers, but its design led to issues that were hard to resolve. Both tools ...
A test compared different C compilers by using them to compile the GNU C Compiler (GCC) itself, and then using the resulting compilers to compile GCC again. Compared to GCC 3.4.2, a TCC modified to compile GCC was able to compile the compiler ten times faster, but the resulting .exe it produced was 57% larger, and much slower, taking 2.2 times ...
C++11 range-based for statements have been implemented in GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) (since version 4.6), Clang (since version 3.0) and Visual C++ 2012 (version 11 [8]) The range-based for is syntactic sugar equivalent to: