Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
1 Electrical resistivity. 2 References. Toggle References subsection. ... 29 Cu copper; use 2.15 nΩm 15.43 nΩm ... 79 Au gold; use 4.81 nΩm 20.51 nΩm
Every material has its own characteristic resistivity. For example, rubber has a far larger resistivity than copper. In a hydraulic analogy, passing current through a high-resistivity material is like pushing water through a pipe full of sand - while passing current through a low-resistivity material is like pushing water through an empty pipe ...
Gold is a good conductor with a resistivity of 2.44 × 10 −8 Ω·m and is essentially nonmagnetic: = 1, so its skin depth at a frequency of 50 Hz is given by = = Lead, in contrast, is a relatively poor conductor (among metals) with a resistivity of 2.2 × 10 −7 Ω·m , about 9 times that of gold.
This is an essential property in electrical wiring systems. Copper has the highest electrical conductivity rating of all non-precious metals: the electrical resistivity of copper = 16.78 nΩ•m at 20 °C. The theory of metals in their solid state [7] helps to explain the unusually high electrical conductivity of copper.
International Annealed Copper Standard (IACS) pure =1.7×10 −8 Ω•m =58.82×10 6 Ω −1 •m −1. For main article, see: Copper in heat exchangers. The TPRC recommended values are for well annealed 99.999% pure copper with residual electrical resistivity of ρ 0 =0.000851 μΩ⋅cm. TPRC Data Series volume 1 page 81. [8]
The resistivity of different materials varies by an enormous amount: For example, the conductivity of teflon is about 10 30 times lower than the conductivity of copper. Loosely speaking, this is because metals have large numbers of "delocalized" electrons that are not stuck in any one place, so they are free to move across large distances.
The inverse of the resistance is known as the conductance. When we consider a metal of unit length and unit cross sectional area, the conductance is known as the conductivity, which is the inverse of resistivity. The Drude model attempts to explain the resistivity of a conductor in terms of the scattering of electrons (the carriers of ...
Kittel [8] gives some values of L ranging from L = 2.23×10 −8 V 2 K −2 for copper at 0 °C to L = 3.2×10 −8 V 2 K −2 for tungsten at 100 °C. Rosenberg [ 9 ] notes that the Wiedemann–Franz law is generally valid for high temperatures and for low (i.e., a few Kelvins) temperatures, but may not hold at intermediate temperatures.