enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pneumonoultramicroscopicsi...

    Although it has been defined as an extension of pneumoconiosis, there is no scientific evidence for a similar disease related to volcanic silica particle exposures. [8] Subsequently, the word was used in Frank Scully's puzzle book Bedside Manna, after which time, members of the N.P.L. campaigned to include the word in major dictionaries. [9] [10]

  3. False accusation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation

    Additionally, once a false accusation has been made – particularly an emotionally laden one – normal human emotional responses to being falsely accused (such as fear, anger, or denial of the accusation) may be misinterpreted as evidence of guilt. [citation needed] Examples would include accusing based off irrational psychotic paranoia.

  4. Argument from ignorance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

    John Locke (1632–1704), the likely originator of the term.. Argument from ignorance (Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), or appeal to ignorance, [a] is an informal fallacy where something is claimed to be true or false because of a lack of evidence to the contrary.

  5. Evidence of absence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence

    In carefully designed scientific experiments, null results can be interpreted as evidence of absence. [7] Whether the scientific community will accept a null result as evidence of absence depends on many factors, including the detection power of the applied methods, the confidence of the inference, as well as confirmation bias within the community.

  6. Circular reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning

    Other ways to express this are that there is no reason to accept the premises unless one already believes the conclusion, or that the premises provide no independent ground or evidence for the conclusion. [3] Circular reasoning is closely related to begging the question, and in modern usage the two generally refer to the same thing. [4]

  7. Plausible deniability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausible_deniability

    The lack of evidence to the contrary ostensibly makes the denial plausible (credible), but sometimes, it makes any accusations only unactionable. The term typically implies forethought, such as intentionally setting up the conditions for the plausible avoidance of responsibility for one's future actions or knowledge.

  8. False evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_evidence

    False evidence, fabricated evidence, forged evidence, fake evidence or tainted evidence is information created or obtained illegally in order to sway the verdict in a court case. Falsified evidence could be created by either side in a case (including the police/ prosecution in a criminal case ), or by someone sympathetic to either side.

  9. Invincible ignorance fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invincible_ignorance_fallacy

    The invincible ignorance fallacy, [1] also known as argument by pigheadedness, [2] is a deductive fallacy of circularity where the person in question simply refuses to believe the argument, ignoring any evidence given. It is not so much a fallacious tactic in argument as it is a refusal to argue in the proper sense of the word. The method used ...