enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to...

    Regarding the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court ruled in Shelley v. Kraemer (1948): [187] "[T]he action inhibited by the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment is only such action as may fairly be said to be that of the States. That Amendment erects no shield against merely private conduct, however discriminatory or wrongful."

  3. Trump v. Anderson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._Anderson

    Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. 100 (2024), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that states could not determine eligibility for federal office, including the presidency, under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  4. List of United States court cases involving the Fourteenth ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    the United States Supreme Court ruled that marriage is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore must be afforded to same-sex couples. The ruling ensured that statewide bans on same-sex marriage could not be held up as constitutional. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard: 2023 600 U.S. 181

  5. How using the 14th Amendment against Trump went from a ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/using-14th-amendment-against-trump...

    The justices are reviewing a landmark decision from Colorado’s top court, which concluded the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban” applies to Trump. ... Dissenting Colorado Supreme Court ...

  6. Takeaways from Trump’s big win at the Supreme Court in the ...

    www.aol.com/takeaways-trump-big-win-supreme...

    Those actions, the state court ruled, violated Section 3 of the 14th Amendment and left Trump ineligible to appear on the state’s ballot. Since then, both Maine and Illinois also moved to take ...

  7. Richardson v. Ramirez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richardson_v._Ramirez

    Richardson v. Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24 (1974), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 6–3, that convicted felons could be barred from voting beyond their sentence and parole without violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

  8. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_Fair...

    Harvard filed an opposing brief seeking to have SFFA's petition rejected by the Supreme Court. [48] [49] In June 2021 the Court requested that the U.S. government submit a brief of its stance on the case, [50] and in December the Solicitor General of the United States under the Biden administration urged the Supreme Court to reject the appeal. [51]

  9. 14th Amendment doesn't ban felons from taking office - AOL

    www.aol.com/14th-amendment-doesnt-ban-felons...

    The Supreme Court in March overturned a Colorado Supreme Court ruling that allowed Trump to be removed from the state’s primary ballots under the provision for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021 ...