Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A relation can be both symmetric and antisymmetric (in this case, it must be coreflexive), and there are relations which are neither symmetric nor antisymmetric (for example, the "preys on" relation on biological species). Antisymmetry is different from asymmetry: a relation is asymmetric if and only if it is antisymmetric and irreflexive.
C-command is a relation between tree nodes, as defined by Tanya Reinhart. [3] Kayne uses a simple definition of c-command based on the "first node up". However, the definition is complicated by his use of a "segment/category" distinction. Two directly connected nodes that have the same label are "segments" of a single "category".
Symmetric and antisymmetric relations By definition, a nonempty relation cannot be both symmetric and asymmetric (where if a is related to b , then b cannot be related to a (in the same way)). However, a relation can be neither symmetric nor asymmetric, which is the case for "is less than or equal to" and "preys on").
If a relation is reflexive, irreflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, asymmetric, transitive, total, trichotomous, a partial order, total order, strict weak order, total preorder (weak order), or an equivalence relation, then so too are its restrictions. However, the transitive closure of a restriction is a subset of the restriction of the ...
For example, that every equivalence relation is symmetric, but not necessarily antisymmetric, is indicated by in the "Symmetric" column and in the "Antisymmetric" column, respectively. All definitions tacitly require the homogeneous relation R {\displaystyle R} be transitive : for all a , b , c , {\displaystyle a,b,c,} if a R b {\displaystyle ...
A binary relation on a set is formally defined as a set of ordered pairs (,) of elements of , and (,) is often abbreviated as .. A relation is reflexive if holds for every element ; it is transitive if imply for all ,,; it is antisymmetric if imply = for all ,; and it is a connex relation if holds for all ,.
A well partial order, or a wpo, is a wqo that is a proper ordering relation, i.e., it is antisymmetric. Among other ways of defining wqo's, one is to say that they are quasi-orderings which do not contain infinite strictly decreasing sequences (of the form x 0 > x 1 > x 2 > ⋯ {\displaystyle x_{0}>x_{1}>x_{2}>\cdots } ) [1] nor infinite ...
Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects Appearance. move to sidebar hide. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Redirect page. Redirect to ...