Ad
related to: oticon more vs intent 1 pro caseebay.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Oticon Intent is an over-the-ear hearing aid packed with Bluetooth features that cater to Android users — Oticon has a QR code you can scan online to see if your device is compatible. The ...
Oticon Medical is a sister company of Oticon, both being subsidiaries of the Demant Group. [10] Whereas Oticon specialises in hearing aids, Oticon Medical specialises in hearing implants and released its first products in 2009. [11] The company's Ponto bone conduction implant is now in its fifth generation. [12]
BTE devices are generally considered more powerful and work best for those with more severe hearing loss. Receiver in canal (RIC) hearing aids are similar to BTE styles but offer a more discreet ...
The business was founded in 1904 by Hans Demant, under the name Oticon.After his death in 1910, his son William Demant took over. [3]Already before World War I, Oticon increased its sales volume to cover Scandinavia and Saint Petersburg.
Speakers with strong voice coils are more expensive and require more energy than the tiny ones used in many modern telephones; phones with the small low-power speakers cannot couple electromagnetically with the telecoil in the hearing aid, so the hearing aid must then switch to acoustic mode.
John Legend cries over Team Niall singer-songwriter Lennon VanderDoes's performance on 'The Voice' -- sparking speculation that, in a new twist, Lennon will be invited back to the show.
A common case would be a future threat of harm that would not constitute common law assault but would nevertheless cause emotional harm to the recipient. IIED was created to guard against this kind of emotional abuse, thereby allowing a victim of emotional distress to receive compensation in situations where he or she would otherwise be barred ...
The case was partially adjudicated before the Supreme Court, which held that the case could go forward for trial by jury. [21] After a decade of proceedings, a jury finally decided in Malcolm's favor on November 2, 1994 on the grounds that, whether or not the quotations were genuine, more evidence would be needed to rule against Malcolm. [22]
Ad
related to: oticon more vs intent 1 pro caseebay.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month