Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For example, if values {,,,,,} are drawn from the same distribution, then we can treat this set as an unweighted sample, or we can treat it as the weighted sample {,,} with corresponding weights {,,}, and we get the same result either way.
The maximum likelihood method weights the difference between fit and data using the same weights . The expected value of a random variable is the weighted average of the possible values it might take on, with the weights being the respective probabilities. More generally, the expected value of a function of a random variable is the probability ...
The second form above illustrates that the logarithm of the geometric mean is the weighted arithmetic mean of the logarithms of the individual values. If all the weights are equal, the weighted geometric mean simplifies to the ordinary unweighted geometric mean. [1]
Data can be binary, ordinal, or continuous variables. It works by normalizing the differences between each pair of variables and then computing a weighted average of these differences. The distance was defined in 1971 by Gower [1] and it takes values between 0 and 1 with smaller values indicating higher similarity.
A weighted average, or weighted mean, is an average in which some data points count more heavily than others in that they are given more weight in the calculation. [6] For example, the arithmetic mean of 3 {\displaystyle 3} and 5 {\displaystyle 5} is 3 + 5 2 = 4 {\displaystyle {\frac {3+5}{2}}=4} , or equivalently 3 ⋅ 1 2 + 5 ⋅ 1 2 = 4 ...
For normally distributed random variables inverse-variance weighted averages can also be derived as the maximum likelihood estimate for the true value. Furthermore, from a Bayesian perspective the posterior distribution for the true value given normally distributed observations and a flat prior is a normal distribution with the inverse-variance weighted average as a mean and variance ().
For any q > 0 and non-negative weights summing to 1, the following inequality holds: (=) / = (=) /. The proof follows from Jensen's inequality , making use of the fact the logarithm is concave: log ∏ i = 1 n x i w i = ∑ i = 1 n w i log x i ≤ log ∑ i = 1 n w i x i . {\displaystyle \log \prod _{i=1}^{n}x_{i}^{w_{i}}=\sum _{i=1 ...
The triangular distribution has a mean equal to the average of the three parameters: μ = a + b + c 3 {\displaystyle \mu ={\frac {a+b+c}{3}}} which (unlike PERT) places equal emphasis on the extreme values which are usually less-well known than the most likely value, and is therefore less reliable.