enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Leader–member exchange theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leader–member_exchange...

    The leader–member exchange (LMX) theory is a relationship-based approach to leadership that focuses on the two-way relationship between leaders and followers. [1]The latest version (2016) of leader–member exchange theory of leadership development explains the growth of vertical dyadic workplace influence and team performance in terms of selection and self-selection of informal ...

  3. Vertical dyad linkage theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_Dyad_Linkage_Theory

    The theory focuses on types of leader-subordinate relationships [4] which are further classified into subgroups, namely the in-group and the out-group. [5] The in-group consists of members that receive greater responsibilities and encouragement, [5] and are able to express opinions without having any restrictions.

  4. Talk:Leader–member exchange theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Leader–member...

    Psychological research in the theory of LMX has empirically proven its usefulness in understanding group processes. The natural tendency for groups to develop into subgroups and create a clique of an in-group versus an out-group is supported by researcher (Bass, 1990).

  5. Talk:Theory X and Theory Y - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Theory_X_and_theory_Y

    The quality of the relationship between the two can be described by Sahin as a term called leader-member exchange (LMX) theory. What LMX theory basically points out against McGregor theory is that “leaders develop unique relationships with different subordinates and that the quality of these relationships is a determinant of how each ...

  6. List of problems in loop theory and quasigroup theory

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_problems_in_loop...

    Let L be a Moufang loop with normal abelian subgroup (associative subloop) M of odd order such that L/M is a cyclic group of order bigger than 3. (i) Is L a group? (ii) If the orders of M and L/M are relatively prime, is L a group? Proposed: by Michael Kinyon, based on (Chein and Rajah, 2000) Comments: The assumption that L/M has order bigger ...

  7. Burnside's theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnside's_theorem

    John G. Thompson pointed out that a proof avoiding the use of representation theory could be extracted from his work in the 1960s and 1970s on the N-group theorem, and this was done explicitly by Goldschmidt (1970) for groups of odd order, and by Bender (1972) for groups of even order. Matsuyama (1973) simplified the proofs.

  8. Category of groups - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_of_groups

    A proof of this is as follows: The set of morphisms from the symmetric group S 3 of order three to itself, = ⁡ (,), has ten elements: an element z whose product on either side with every element of E is z (the homomorphism sending every element to the identity), three elements such that their product on one fixed side is always itself (the ...

  9. Michio Suzuki (mathematician) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michio_Suzuki_(mathematician)

    The smallest, of order 29120, was the first simple group of order less than 1 million to be discovered since Dickson's list of 1900. He classified several classes of simple groups of small rank, including the CIT-groups and C-groups and CA-groups. There is also a sporadic simple group called the Suzuki group, which he