enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubby,_Inc._v._CompuServe_Inc.

    The case resolved a claim of libel against CompuServe, an Internet service provider that hosted allegedly defamatory content in one of its forums. The case established a precedent for Internet service provider liability by applying defamation law, originally intended for hard copies of written works, to the Internet medium. The court held that ...

  3. Defamation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation

    ARTICLE 353. Definition of Libel. – A libel is a public and malicious imputation of a crime, or of a vice or defect, real or imaginary, or any act, omission, condition, status, or circumstance tending to cause the dishonor, discredit, or contempt of a natural or juridical person, or to blacken the memory of one who is dead.

  4. English defamation law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_defamation_law

    The report was highly critical of English libel law and the "chilling" effect it has on free expression globally. The report made 10 recommendations on how English libel law could be improved; including reversing the burden of proof, capping damages at £10,000, introducing a single publication rule, and establishing libel tribunals (to reduce ...

  5. Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratton_Oakmont,_Inc._v...

    Prodigy, an early online content hosting site, hosted a bulletin board called Money Talk on which anonymous persons could post messages about finance and investing. In October 1994, an unidentified user on Money Talk submitted a post claiming that Stratton Oakmont, a securities investment banking firm based in Long Island, New York, and its president Danny Porush, had committed criminal and ...

  6. United States defamation law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law

    Though the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect freedom of the press, for most of the history of the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court failed to use it to rule on libel cases. This left libel laws, based upon the traditional "Common Law" of defamation inherited from the English legal system, mixed across the states.

  7. Barrett v. Rosenthal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrett_v._Rosenthal

    The case was originally captioned Barrett v. Clark. The defendants were accused of libel and conspiracy to libel, for publishing or republishing allegedly defamatory statements on the internet. [4] Rosenthal was represented by an attorney from the California Anti-SLAPP Project. [3]

  8. images.huffingtonpost.com

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2012-08-30-3258_001.pdf

    Created Date: 8/30/2012 4:52:52 PM

  9. British Chiropractic Association v Singh - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Chiropractic...

    The Singh case and several other high-profile cases prompted three organizations (Sense about Science, Index on Censorship, and English PEN) – all concerned about free speech and scientific debate – to join forces to form the Libel Reform Campaign. [1] On 25 April 2013, the Defamation Act 2013 received royal assent and became law. The ...