Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[8] [9] [verification needed] Cramer's rule can also be numerically unstable even for 2×2 systems. [10] However, Cramer's rule can be implemented with the same complexity as Gaussian elimination, [11] [12] (consistently requires twice as many arithmetic operations and has the same numerical stability when the same permutation matrices are ...
The number of distinct terms (including those with a zero coefficient) in an n-th degree equation in two variables is (n + 1)(n + 2) / 2.This is because the n-th degree terms are ,, …,, numbering n + 1 in total; the (n − 1) degree terms are ,, …,, numbering n in total; and so on through the first degree terms and , numbering 2 in total, and the single zero degree term (the constant).
The logarithmic moment generating function (which is the cumulant-generating function) of a random variable is defined as: = [ ()].Let ,, … be a sequence of iid real random variables with finite logarithmic moment generating function, i.e. () < for all .
Cramer's rule is a closed-form expression, in terms of determinants, of the solution of a system of n linear equations in n unknowns. Cramer's rule is useful for reasoning about the solution, but, except for n = 2 or 3 , it is rarely used for computing a solution, since Gaussian elimination is a faster algorithm.
Cramér’s decomposition theorem, a statement about the sum of normal distributed random variable; Cramér's theorem (large deviations), a fundamental result in the theory of large deviations; Cramer's theorem (algebraic curves), a result regarding the necessary number of points to determine a curve
In statistics, Cramér's V (sometimes referred to as Cramér's phi and denoted as φ c) is a measure of association between two nominal variables, giving a value between 0 and +1 (inclusive). It is based on Pearson's chi-squared statistic and was published by Harald Cramér in 1946. [1]
The equations 3x + 2y = 6 and 3x + 2y = 12 are inconsistent. A linear system is inconsistent if it has no solution, and otherwise, it is said to be consistent. [7] When the system is inconsistent, it is possible to derive a contradiction from the equations, that may always be rewritten as the statement 0 = 1. For example, the equations
The Cramér–Rao bound is stated in this section for several increasingly general cases, beginning with the case in which the parameter is a scalar and its estimator is unbiased.