enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (science)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    Articles published in respected peer-reviewed scientific journals are preferred for up-to-date reliable information. Scientific literature contains two major types of sources: primary publications that describe novel research for the first time, and review articles that summarize and integrate a topic of research into an overall view.

  3. List of academic databases and search engines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_databases...

    List: biography, education, employment, works, grants, peer-review. Over 9.3 million profiles. Free ORCID Inc. Philosophy Documentation Center eCollection: Applied ethics, Philosophy, Religious studies: Journals, series, conference proceedings, and other works from several countries online Free & Subscription Philosophy Documentation Center

  4. Web of Science - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_Science

    Regarding the more objective journal metrics, there is a growing view that for greater accuracy it must be supplemented with article-level metrics and peer-review. [44] Studies of methodological quality and reliability have found that "reliability of published research works in several fields may be decreasing with increasing journal rank". [45]

  5. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    Peer-reviewed medical journals are a natural choice as a source for up-to-date medical information in Wikipedia articles. Journal articles come in many different types, and are a mixture of primary and secondary sources. Primary publications describe new research, while review articles summarize and integrate a topic of research into an overall ...

  6. Peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review

    Peer review is generally considered necessary to academic quality and is used in most major scholarly journals. However, peer review does not prevent publication of invalid research, [18] and as experimentally controlled studies of this process are difficult to arrange, direct evidence that peer review improves the quality of published papers ...

  7. Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    These publications, which may be in peer-reviewed journal articles or in some other form, are often called the primary literature to differentiate them from unpublished sources. Narrative reviews , systematic reviews and meta-analyses are considered secondary sources, because they are based on and analyze or interpret (rather than merely citing ...

  8. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    A claim of peer review is not an indication that the journal is respected, or that any meaningful peer review occurs. Journals that are not peer reviewed by the wider academic community should not be considered reliable, except to show the views of the groups represented by those journals. [notes 1]

  9. Scopus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopus

    Scopus is a scientific abstract and citation database, launched by the academic publisher Elsevier as a competitor to older Web of Science in 2004. [1] An ensuing competition between the two databases has been characterized as "intense" and is considered to significantly benefit their users in terms of continuous improvent in coverage, search/analysis capabilities, but not in price.