Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The book contains a selection [Note 1] of questions and answers originally published on his blog What If?, along with several new ones. [1] The book is divided into several dozen chapters, most of which are devoted to answering a unique question. [Note 2] What If? was released on September 2, 2014 and was received positively by critics.
In a 1991 Ministry review, Daniel Guild calls the book "Yancey at his superlative best". [6] In 2000, Jim Remsen of The Philadelphia Inquirer called the title of the book evocative. [ 7 ] A 2001 article in U.S. Catholic states that Disappointment with God demonstrates Yancey's willingness to address difficult questions. [ 8 ]
"The Argument from Unbelief" at Philosophy of Religion .Info: Offers a simple overview and rebuttal. Responses to the problem of Divine Hiddenness from the website of the Christian Colligation of Apologetics Debate Research & Evangelism. Daniel Howard-Snyder. Academic papers and books by one of the most respected critics of Schellenberg's argument.
Contents Introduction 7 A different kind of snow 9 Infernal combustion and the mobile phone 13 Sweetener for my sweet 16 Only dedicated practice makes perfect 21
A book review is a form of literary criticism in which a book is merely described (summary review) or analyzed based on content, style, and merit. [ 1 ] A book review may be a primary source , an opinion piece, a summary review, or a scholarly view. [ 2 ]
Before the Internet, Book Review Digest was a significant reference tool and bibliographic aid used by the American public and librarians alike to find current literature. An online edition of the collection is offered in two subscription products: Book Review Digest Retrospective (1905–1982) and Book Review Digest Plus (1983 through present ...
Vagueness and Degrees of Truth is a 2008 book by Nicholas J. Smith, in which the author examines vagueness based on the idea of "degrees of truth". It means that although some sentences are true and some are false, others possess intermediate truth values. In other words, some sentences are truer than the false sentences, but not as true as the ...
Philosopher Lynne Rudder Baker has outlined four main contemporary approaches to belief in her book Saving Belief: [83] Our common-sense understanding of belief is correct – Sometimes called the "mental sentence theory," in this conception, beliefs exist as coherent entities, and the way we talk about them in everyday life is a valid basis ...