Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Ford Expedition XLT. Known internally at Ford as the UN93, the first generation Expedition was developed under the UN93 program from 1993 to 1996, headed by chief engineer Dale Claudepierre at a cost of US$1.3 billion. Initial planning began in 1991 parallel to PN96 F-Series development, prior to the UN93 program fully being approved in 1993.
The Lincoln Navigator was also developed under the Ford program code name UN173, with the Expedition developed under the UN93 program code name. [9] A full-size body-on-frame vehicle, the Navigator was mechanically related to the Ford Expedition; both vehicles were related to the 1997 Ford F-Series. The Navigator featured independent front ...
UN93: Ford Expedition [1] [96] 94 1993 95 SN95: ... Ford Expedition [3]: Standard wheelbase models, Expedition EL is coded U354. U32X 325 2006 326
Ford announced in 2014 plans to reduce its vehicle platforms from sixteen to nine. [1] In 2014, Ford vehicles were built on fifteen distinct platforms. This only applies to Ford and Lincoln and not to any brands that were previously held by the company (such as Mazda and Volvo), and is expected to cut costs by 20%.
The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said on Monday it is upgrading a probe into 129,222 Ford Motor vehicles over reports of collisions involving the company's hands-free ...
Farley said Ford has enough inventory, including parts, to endure a couple of weeks of tariffs without having to ship car components across the U.S.'s southern and northern borders. Over the long ...
The Ford Excursion was introduced for the 2000 model year on September 30, 1999. [7] In contrast to the Expedition (which replaced the Bronco), the Excursion had no direct predecessor in the Ford truck line. The model line is outranked in length (both body and wheelbase) and height by the Ford E-350 12/15-passenger van.
From January 2008 to December 2012, if you bought shares in companies when John L. Thornton joined the board, and sold them when he left, you would have a 60.3 percent return on your investment, compared to a -2.8 percent return from the S&P 500.