enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Handling primary, secondary and tertiary sources ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Handling_primary...

    It is possible to create original research based on any source: primary, secondary or tertiary; and in all cases this should be avoided. However, particular care should be taken with primary sources because it is easy to misuse them. Most statements of fact or opinion come ultimately from primary sources, via analysis, interpretation or synthesis.

  3. Wikipedia talk:Handling primary, secondary and tertiary ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Handling...

    In cases where a secondary or tertiary source and primary source disagree, it's best to quote the secondary source in the article, and note in a footnote that a specific primary source disagrees. One should not assume the primary source is correct, since the secondary source may be using a different edition or translation of the primary.

  4. Wikipedia:When to cite - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:When_to_cite

    INCITE: Cite your sources in the form of an inline citation after the phrase, sentence, or paragraph in question. INTEXT: Add in-text attribution whenever you copy or closely paraphrase a source's words. INTEGRITY: Maintain text–source integrity by placing inline citations in a way that makes clear which source supports which part of the text.

  5. Wikipedia:Don't cite essays or proposals as if they were policy

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Don't_cite_essays...

    Essays, proposals and information pages should only be cited as opinions or advice, not admonishment. They should not be used as an end-run around the Wikipedia process of establishing consensus. It is not a good idea to quote essays—including this one—as though they are Wikipedia-approved policies or guidelines. Essays can be written ...

  6. Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    Primary sources can be reliable, and they can be used. Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source, such as when you are supporting a direct quotation. In such cases, the original document is the best source because the original document will be free of any errors or misquotations introduced by subsequent sources.

  7. Wikipedia : Citing sources/Alternative proposal

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources/...

    References typically include: the name of the author, the title of the book or article, the name of the publisher, and the date of publication. Different professions, academic disciplines, and publishers have different conventions as to the order in which this information should be arranged, or whether additional information is required.

  8. Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_Wikipedia

    Information in Wikipedia is often accompanied by a reference. You can use Wikipedia to find the source of the information and cite that. Indeed, Wikipedia can often be a good starting point for research to other sources of information. Some Wikipedia articles have been published in peer reviewed academic literature. In that case, it is possible ...

  9. Wikipedia:Citing sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources

    In particular, sources are needed for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged. If reliable sources cannot be found for challenged material, it is likely to be removed from the article. Sources are also required when quoting someone, with or without quotation marks, or closely paraphrasing a source. But the need to cite sources is ...