enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Handling primary, secondary and tertiary sources ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Handling_primary...

    When citing a secondary source quoting a primary source, it is good practice is to verify that the secondary source is quoting the primary source correctly, and to add an ancillary citation to the primary source itself. If you can not find the original primary source, do not cite it. i.e. if you have seen only the secondary source, your ...

  3. Wikipedia:When to cite - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:When_to_cite

    INCITE: Cite your sources in the form of an inline citation after the phrase, sentence, or paragraph in question. INTEXT: Add in-text attribution whenever you copy or closely paraphrase a source's words. INTEGRITY: Maintain text–source integrity by placing inline citations in a way that makes clear which source supports which part of the text.

  4. Wikipedia : No original research/PSTS

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original...

    They rely on primary sources for their material, making analytic or evaluative claims about them. [d] For example, a review article that analyzes research papers in a field is a secondary source for the research. [e] Whether a source is primary or secondary depends on context. A book by a military historian about the Second World War might be a ...

  5. Help:How to mine a source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:How_to_mine_a_source

    For science material, the usual secondary source is a literature review. We like to have both, because secondary sources indicate acceptance by other experts and are more understandable by more readers, while primary ones provide details and are especially useful to university students and experts using Wikipedia.

  6. Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    A primary source can have all of these qualities, and a secondary source may have none of them. Deciding whether primary, secondary or tertiary sources are appropriate on any given occasion is a matter of good editorial judgment and common sense, not merely mindless, knee-jerk reactions to classification of a source as "primary" or "secondary".

  7. Wikipedia:Attribution/FAQ - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Attribution/FAQ

    Secondary sources are documents or people that summarize other material, usually primary source material. They are academics, journalists, and other researchers, and the papers and books they produce. A theologian's account of what the Bible says is a secondary source. A sociologist thesis based on his research of primary sources is a secondary ...

  8. Wikipedia talk:Handling primary, secondary and tertiary ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Handling...

    When citing a secondary source quoting a primary source, it is good practice is to verify that the secondary source is quoting the primary source correctly, and to add an ancillary citation to the primary source itself. For large sources, allow the quoted section to be found by providing page numbers or similar information.

  9. Help:Referencing for beginners - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Referencing_for_beginners

    Sources that are reliable for some material are not reliable for other material. For instance, otherwise unreliable self-published sources are usually acceptable to support uncontroversial information about the source's author. You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about living people.