enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of rules of inference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rules_of_inference

    Rules of inference are syntactical transform rules which one can use to infer a conclusion from a premise to create an argument. A set of rules can be used to infer any valid conclusion if it is complete, while never inferring an invalid conclusion, if it is sound.

  3. Rule of inference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_inference

    But a rule of inference's action is purely syntactic, and does not need to preserve any semantic property: any function from sets of formulae to formulae counts as a rule of inference. Usually only rules that are recursive are important; i.e. rules such that there is an effective procedure for determining whether any given formula is the ...

  4. Contraposition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraposition

    In mathematics, proof by contrapositive, or proof by contraposition, is a rule of inference used in proofs, where one infers a conditional statement from its contrapositive. [15] In other words, the conclusion "if A , then B " is inferred by constructing a proof of the claim "if not B , then not A " instead.

  5. Absorption (logic) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absorption_(logic)

    Absorption is a valid argument form and rule of inference of propositional logic. [1] [2] The rule states that if implies , then implies and .The rule makes it possible to introduce conjunctions to proofs.

  6. Category:Rules of inference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Rules_of_inference

    Pages in category "Rules of inference" The following 43 pages are in this category, out of 43 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. ...

  7. Conjunction introduction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjunction_introduction

    Conjunction introduction (often abbreviated simply as conjunction and also called and introduction or adjunction) [1] [2] [3] is a valid rule of inference of propositional logic. The rule makes it possible to introduce a conjunction into a logical proof.

  8. Destructive dilemma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destructive_dilemma

    Destructive dilemma [1] [2] is the name of a valid rule of inference of propositional logic. It is the inference that, if P implies Q and R implies S and either Q is false or S is false, then either P or R must be false. In sum, if two conditionals are true, but one of their consequents is false, then one of their antecedents has to be false.

  9. Disjunctive syllogism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunctive_syllogism

    where the rule is that whenever instances of "", and "" appear on lines of a proof, "" can be placed on a subsequent line. Disjunctive syllogism is closely related and similar to hypothetical syllogism , which is another rule of inference involving a syllogism.