enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: negligence cases in nursing practice

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Bolitho v City and Hackney HA - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolitho_v_City_and_Hackney_HA

    Bolitho v. City and Hackney Health Authority [1996] 4 All ER 771 is an important English tort law case, on the standard of care required by medical specialists. It follows the Bolam test for professional negligence, and addresses the interaction with the concept of causation.

  3. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolam_v_Friern_Hospital...

    Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582 is an English tort law case that lays down the typical rule for assessing the appropriate standard of reasonable care in negligence cases involving skilled professionals such as doctors. This rule is known as the Bolam test, and states that if a doctor reaches the standard of a ...

  4. Medical malpractice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_malpractice

    In common law jurisdictions, medical malpractice liability is normally based on the tort of negligence. [3]Although the law of medical malpractice differs significantly between nations, as a broad general rule liability follows when a health care practitioner does not show a fair, reasonable and competent degree of skill when providing medical care to a patient. [3]

  5. Medical malpractice in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_malpractice_in_the...

    Likewise, damage can occur without negligence, for example, when someone dies from a fatal disease. In cases involving suicide, physicians and particularly psychiatrists may be to a different standard than other defendants in a tort claim. In most tort cases, suicide is legally viewed as an act which terminates a chain of causality.

  6. RaDonda Vaught homicide case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RaDonda_Vaught_homicide_case

    In July 2021, the nursing board revoked Vaught's license and fined her $3,000. During her testimony, she took responsibility for the error, but also described procedural issues at the hospital. "Overriding was something we did as a part of our practice every day. You couldn't get a bag of fluids for a patient without using an override function."

  7. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_v_Lanarkshire...

    Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 is a Scottish delict, medical negligence and English tort law case on doctors and pharmacists that outlines the rule on the disclosure of risks to satisfy the criteria of an informed consent.

  1. Ads

    related to: negligence cases in nursing practice