Ads
related to: research verified complaintsconsumereview.org has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The IFCN reviews fact-checkers for compliance with its code, and issues a certification to publishers who pass the audit. The certification lasts for one year, and fact-checkers must be re-examined annually to retain their certifications. [2] IFCN lists 170 organizations as members as of July 2024. [3]
The Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) is an American organization dedicated to identifying and predicting the spread of ideologically motivated threats (e.g. hate groups), disinformation, and misinformation across social media platforms and physical spaces.
In December 2015, G2 surpassed 50,000 verified-user product reviews, more than 28,000 of which were submitted that year. The firm also reported that more than 3,000 reviews were submitted per month on average. [13] In January 2016, G2 reported more than 400,000 sessions per month, and includes more than 400 product categories. [14]
"In the fourth case, the verified complaint alleged that the agent immediately informed the tester that property is 'not signed up for Section 8, it's not approved for that,' and told the tester ...
Florida's Office of the Attorney General has received over 200 complaints about price gouging as residents prepare to evacuate from Hurricane Milton. ... “By doing research on a company or ...
Cabells' Predatory Reports is a paid subscription service provided by Cabell Publishing featuring a database of deceptive and predatory journals, and Journalytics is a database of "verified, reputable journals", with details about those journals' acceptance rates and invited article percentages. [1]
PubPeer is a website that allows users to discuss and review scientific research after publication, i.e. post-publication peer review, established in 2012. The site has served as a whistleblowing platform, in that it highlighted shortcomings in several high-profile papers, in some cases leading to retractions and to accusations of scientific ...
According to the former editor-in-chief, Fatimah Jackson, it was motivated by failures to include the editorial board in the journal's review process, and by "consistent and flagrant unethical breaches by the editorial staff in China", for whom publishing the journal "was only about making money." According to Beall, this was the first mass ...
Ads
related to: research verified complaintsconsumereview.org has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month