enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Nixon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Nixon

    United States v. Nixon , 418 U.S. 683 (1974), was a landmark decision [ 1 ] of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court unanimously ordered President Richard Nixon to deliver tape recordings and other subpoenaed materials related to the Watergate scandal to a federal district court .

  3. The Nixon rulings at the centre of Trump’s Supreme Court ...

    www.aol.com/nixon-rulings-centre-trump-supreme...

    The special counsel’s office is citing the second, better-known Nixon case in its arguments to the court. United States v Nixon is considered a landmark decision and one that ultimately led to ...

  4. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 24 Cal.2d 453, 150 P.2d 436 (1944) Important case in the development of the common law of product liability in the United States based on the concurring opinion of California Supreme Court justice Roger Traynor who stated "that a manufacturer incurs an absolute liability when an article that he has placed on the market ...

  5. Nixon v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_v._United_States

    Nixon v. United States , 506 U.S. 224 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court decision that determined that a question of whether the Senate had properly tried an impeachment was political in nature and could not be resolved in the courts if there was no applicable judicial standard.

  6. Opinion: It’s been 50 years since Nixon resigned ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/opinion-50-years-since-nixon...

    The high court delivered a unanimous order that Nixon had to comply with a judicial subpoena seeking specific evidence – taped White House conversations – that was instrumental to Nixon’s ...

  7. Majority opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_opinion

    In the United States, the disposition of an appeal in a majority opinion is usually drafted in the present tense, so that the disposition is itself a performative utterance. That is, a U.S. court will say that "we affirm (or reverse)" the lower court's decision, or, "the decision of the [lower court] is hereby affirmed (or reversed)."

  8. Opinion: Jack Smith’s ingenious response to Trump’s immunity ...

    www.aol.com/opinion-trump-immunity-defense...

    We think the Supreme Court will give it the back of the hand. But the high court must move briskly. In an ordinary case, such complex legal issues can take years to wind their way through all the ...

  9. Executive privilege - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_privilege

    The Supreme Court addressed executive privilege in United States v. Nixon, the 1974 case involving the demand by Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox that President Richard Nixon produce the audiotapes of conversations he and his colleagues had in the Oval Office of the White House in connection with criminal charges being brought against ...