Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Theory-driven evaluation (also theory-based evaluation) is an umbrella term for any approach to program evaluation that develops a theory of change and uses it to design, implement, analyze, and interpret findings from an evaluation. [1] [2] [3] More specifically, an evaluation is theory-driven if it: [4]
National Legislative Program Evaluation Society Includes links to state offices of program evaluation and/or performance auditing in the US. 4-H Youth Development Programs [permanent dead link ] This is a teaching website and provides help wishing to evaluate their programs. Program evaluation and Outcome management - The Urban Institute
The PRECEDE–PROCEED model is a participatory model for creating successful community health promotion and other public health interventions. It is based on the premise that behavior change is by and large voluntary, and that health programs are more likely to be effective if they are planned and evaluated with the active participation of ...
The CIPP evaluation model is a program evaluation model which was developed by Daniel Stufflebeam and colleagues in the 1960s. CIPP is an acronym for context, input, process and product. CIPP is a decision-focused approach to evaluation and emphasizes the systematic provision of information for program management and operation. [1]
The GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a method of assessing the certainty in evidence (also known as quality of evidence or confidence in effect estimates) and the strength of recommendations in health care. [1]
The Donabedian model is a conceptual model that provides a framework for examining health services and evaluating quality of health care. [1] According to the model, information about quality of care can be drawn from three categories: "structure", "process", and "outcomes". [ 2 ]
The intervention mapping approach of Bartholomew et al. [11] makes an extensive use of the logic model through the whole life-cycle of a health promotion program. Since this method can start from as far as a vague desired outcome (author's example is a city whose actors decide to address "health issues" of the city), planners go through various ...
Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed public health journal that covers all aspects of the evaluation of health care. The founding editors-in-chief were R. Barker Bausell and Carolyn F. Waltz ( University of Maryland, Baltimore ), [ 1 ] and the current one is Steve Sussman ( University of Southern California ).