Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Team-reverting is a separate issue, and anyway there is little benefit to it under the rule since once the "day" is over, you would just have to go back and fight the same war all over again. In my opinion, any limitation of reverting inherently encourages discussion. --Michael Snow 00:02, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Click Back to Inbox or Back to New Mail when done. Switch inbox style on mobile web. 1. Tap the Menu icon. 2. Tap Settings. 3.
Reverting a contribution is sometimes appropriate. However, reverting good-faith actions of other editors can also be disruptive and may lead to the reverter being temporarily blocked from editing. The three-revert rule (part of the edit warring policy) limits the number of times an editor can revert edits (including partial reversions) on a page.
Using the revert approach, you'd have to revert the article to the last good version (the one on January 1), and then manually add back the good edits of January 4 and 5. That would be the only way to avoid denying the readers of Wikipedia the good information and penalizing the editors who supplied it but missed the vandalism.
If you've cleared the cache in your web browser, but are still experiencing issues, you may need to restore its original settings.This can remove adware, get rid of extensions you didn't install, and improve overall performance.
Restoring part of a reverted edit is a recommended practice in online collaborative writing.. Often when an article version contains more than one disagreeable passage, it is easy to revert to a previous version.
If you access AOL Mail using your mobile web browser and experience any performance issues, switch to the basic version. It's recommended you create a bookmark to access basic mail, otherwise you may have to complete these steps each time.
Stay on point and pick your responses. If discussion dies off, you can always go back and get yourself reverted again to find (or refind) other interested parties. Carefully consider whether "policy", "consensus", or "procedure" are valid reasons for the revert: These sometimes get overused on consensus-based wikis even though consensus can change.