Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Get shortened URL; Download QR code ... com from the blacklist please remove from the black list to update stock ... on my home PC running Avast! as hosting a trojan ...
Additions to the local spam blacklist will only affect the English-language edition of Wikipedia, not other projects. Blacklisting requests may be made at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist. However, blacklisting a URL should be used as a last resort against spammers. You should consider the following before requesting that a URL be blacklisted:
Request for removal of the blacklist entry. Note that if a domain has a significant past where it was heavily spammed, administrators at the blacklist are likely going to refer you to the whitelist. There are two request areas to de-blacklist a link: For locally blacklisted sites, with "Local" meaning the English Wikipedia only; or
Screenshot of a website blocking the creation of content which matches a regular expression term on its blacklist. In computing, a blacklist, disallowlist, blocklist, or denylist is a basic access control mechanism that allows through all elements (email addresses, users, passwords, URLs, IP addresses, domain names, file hashes, etc.), except those explicitly mentioned.
May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) The Abusive Hosts Blocking List ( AHBL ) was an internet abuse tracking and filtering system developed by The Summit Open Source Development Group, and based on the original Summit Blocking List (2000–2002).
It could be blocked from the shared list of blocked sites at m:Spam blacklist, or it could be listed on the local list at MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. To find out which it is, go to this site and enter in the address. If you see an entry under "meta blacklist", then the site is blocked on the shared list; otherwise, it is on the local list.
Those attempting to spread malware place "clean" advertisements on trustworthy sites first in order to gain a good reputation, then they later "insert a virus or spyware in the code behind the ad, and after a mass virus infection is produced, they remove the virus", thus infecting all visitors of the site during that time period.
In 2015, research by Emsisoft suggested that all free download providers bundled their downloads with potentially unwanted software, and that Download.com was the worst offender. [4] Lowell Heddings expressed dismay that "Sadly, even on Google all the top results for most open source and freeware are just ads for really terrible sites that are ...