enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Honest services fraud - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honest_services_fraud

    Honest services fraud is a crime defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1346 (the federal mail and wire fraud statute), added by the United States Congress in 1988, [1] which states "For the purposes of this chapter, the term scheme or artifice to defraud includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services."

  3. Mail and wire fraud - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_and_wire_fraud

    Mail fraud was first defined in the United States in 1872. 18 U.S.C. § 1341 provides: Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply, or furnish or procure for unlawful use ...

  4. Think someone stole your mail? Tips for mail fraud protection ...

    www.aol.com/think-someone-stole-mail-tips...

    The best first course of action to take if you think you are a victim of mail theft is to report it to the U.S. Postal Service. You can file a complaint online or call 1-800-275-8777. Show comments

  5. Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_prosecution_of...

    Several statutes, mostly codified in Title 18 of the United States Code, provide for federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States.Federal prosecutions of public corruption under the Hobbs Act (enacted 1934), the mail and wire fraud statutes (enacted 1872), including the honest services fraud provision, the Travel Act (enacted 1961), and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt ...

  6. McNally v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McNally_v._United_States

    McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 (1987), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that the federal statute criminalizing mail fraud applied only to the schemes and artifices defrauding victims of money or property, as opposed to those defrauding citizens of their rights to good government.

  7. United States v. Young (1914) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Young_(1914)

    United States v. Young, 232 U.S. 155 (1914), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that the Criminal Code of 1909 does not require indictments for mail fraud to show that the fraudulent mailed statements were directly shown to the defrauded party.

  8. Pereira v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pereira_v._United_States

    Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1 (1954), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the word "knowingly" in the federal mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, [1] should extend to all reasonably foreseeable consequences, even ones not specifically intended.

  9. CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN-SPAM_Act_of_2003

    The Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography And Marketing (CAN-SPAM) Act of 2003 is a law passed in 2003 establishing the United States' first national standards for the sending of commercial e-mail. The law requires the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to enforce its provisions.