enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: 28 usc 2254 writ of habeas corpus petition

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Darr v. Burford - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darr_v._Burford

    Congress authorized federal courts in 28 USC § 2254 to grant habeas review when the state process was "ineffective to protect the rights of the prisoner". The exhaustion requirement recognized in Ex parte Hawk was codified in the 1948 amendment to § 2254: "This new section is declaratory of existing law as affirmed by the Supreme Court.

  3. Brown v. Allen - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Allen

    United States courts are authorized by statute (28 USC §2241 pursuant to §2254) to grant habeas relief to prisoners who have been convicted by a state court. [ 2 ] Justice Felix Frankfurter concurring in Brown notes the "uniqueness" of habeas corpus is its availability to "bring into question the legality of a person's restraint and to ...

  4. Thompson v. Keohane - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thompson_v._Keohane

    Thompson then filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. The district court deferred to the judgement of the state courts under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), which states that in most circumstances questions of fact are presumed correct by appeals courts. [14]

  5. Howes v. Fields - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howes_v._Fields

    Habeas corpus petitions are a very old judicial process, dating back to the 12th century in England. [10] More recently, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), codified in 28 U.S.C. § 2254, had imposed particular limits on how federal courts in the U.S. handled habeas corpus petitions from prisoners in state prisons.

  6. Davis v. Ayala - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._Ayala

    Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) Davis v. ... The right to petition for a writ of habeas corpus under federal law

  7. Lackawanna County District Attorney v. Coss - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lackawanna_County_District...

    As the basis for the habeas challenge was Title 28, Section §2254 of the United States Code, each element of that section had to be fulfilled in order to gain relief (a reduction in sentence). [4] The first element was that the petitioner is "in custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court", a status that Coss could not fulfill as he was ...

  8. Harvey v. Horan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_v._Horan

    On July 25, 1995, the district court dismissed Harvey's petition, finding that he had not exhausted state remedies and would have to refile his claim for DNA testing as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

  9. Habeas corpus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus

    Habeas corpus (/ ˈ h eɪ b i ə s ˈ k ɔːr p ə s / ⓘ; from Medieval Latin, lit. ' you should have the body ') [1] is an equitable remedy [2] by which a report can be made to a court alleging the unlawful detention or imprisonment of an individual, and requesting that the court order the individual's custodian (usually a prison official) to bring the prisoner to court, to determine ...

  1. Ads

    related to: 28 usc 2254 writ of habeas corpus petition