enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gold Clause Cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Clause_Cases

    Separately, the federal government and the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, as creditors of the Iron Mountain Railway, intervened in a case brought by the Missouri Pacific Railroad for additional payment on Iron Mountain bonds. In both cases the district and appeal courts upheld the Gold Clause Resolution and denied additional payment.

  3. Executive Order 6102 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102

    The limitation on gold ownership in the US was repealed after President Gerald Ford signed a bill to "permit United States citizens to purchase, hold, sell, or otherwise deal with gold in the United States or abroad" with an act of Congress codified in Pub. L. 93–373, [22] [23] [24] which went into effect December 31, 1974.

  4. Missouri, Kansas, & Texas Railway Co. of Texas v. May

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri,_Kansas,_&_Texas...

    Missouri, Kansas, [] & Texas Railway Company of Texas v. Clay May, 194 U.S. 267 (1904), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that a Texas law did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by penalizing only railroad companies for allowing certain weeds to mature and go to seed on their land.

  5. Missouri v. Holland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_v._Holland

    Case history; Prior: United States v. Samples, 258 F. 479 (W.D. Mo. 1919): Holding; Protection of a State's quasi-sovereign right to regulate the taking of game is an insufficient jurisdictional basis, apart from any pecuniary interest, for a bill by a State to enjoin enforcement of federal regulations over the subject alleged to be unconstitutional.

  6. McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCabe_v._Atchison,_Topeka...

    McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, 235 U.S. 151 (1914), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that an Oklahoma law was unconstitutional insofar as it did not provide dining cars and other luxury accommodations for African-American passengers, however the Court also ruled that the litigants were not entitled to equitable relief because they lacked ...

  7. List of executive actions by Franklin D. Roosevelt - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_executive_actions...

    Amendment of Executive Order No. 9-2 of January 28, 1873, Relating to the Holding of State, Municipal, or Other Local Office by Federal Officers and Employees August 27, 1933 226 6260: Relating to the Hoarding, Export, and Earmarking of Gold Coin, Bullion, or Currency and to Transactions in Foreign Exchange August 28, 1933 227 6260-A

  8. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Ward - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_life...

    Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Ward, 470 U.S. 869 (1985), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a state cannot tax out-of-state insurance companies at a greater rate than domestic insurance companies under the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article Four of the United States Constitution.

  9. Palmer v. Thompson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmer_v._Thompson

    Thompson, 403 U.S. 217 (1971), is a United States Supreme Court civil rights case which concerned the interpretation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [ 1 ] Background