Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Ethical eating or food ethics refers to the moral consequences [1] [2] of food choices, both those made by humans and animals. Common concerns are damage to the environment, [3] exploitive labor practices, food shortages for others, inhumane treatment of food animals, and the unintended effects of food policy. [4]
Various types of meat. Conversations regarding the ethics of eating meat are focused on whether or not it is moral to eat non-human animals.Ultimately, this is a debate that has been ongoing for millennia, and it remains one of the most prominent topics in food ethics. [1]
The Ethics of Diet: A Catena of Authorities Deprecatory of the Practice of Flesh-eating is an 1883 book by Howard Williams, on the history of vegetarianism. The book was influential on the development of the Victorian vegetarian movement.
German author Bernard Moncriff’s 1856 book The Philosophy of the Stomach; or an Exclusively Animal Diet is the Most Wholesome and Fit for Man outlines an argument for why men can and should eat ...
Diet culture refers to a common set of trends and norms that may specifically affect those undertaking dieting or monitoring their caloric or nutritional intake.It often describes a set of societal beliefs pertaining to food and body image, primarily focused on losing weight, an endorsement of thinness as a high moral standard, and the alteration of food consumption.
Rynn Berry—a vegetarian activist and author on vegetarian history—supported the notion that Hitler's vegetarianism was "a marketing scheme concocted by Nazi propagandists" who wished to create a better public perception of Hitler, and was mostly for health reasons rather than moral ones (noting his fondness for liver dumplings), concluding ...
According to her, “a diet adequate in fiber [content] can help reduce the risk of heart disease and type 2 diabetes.” Some good sources of dietary fiber are vegetables, fruit, whole grains ...
Other research has shown how moral disengagement operates in the deactivation of moral self-regulatory processes when considering the impact of meat consumption. In particular, a 2016 study offered an interpretation of moral disengagement as a motivated reasoning process which is triggered by loss aversion and dissonance avoidance. [89]