Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Maryland decision found that prosecutors would violate a defendant's right to due process if they withheld exculpatory evidence. California also handles felony murder cases, in which a person is ...
Jul. 13—Erlinda Ocampo Johnson was second chair on the prosecution team for the involuntary manslaughter case against actor and producer Alec Baldwin. But she became a main character in the ...
The prosecution’s previous case against Baldwin fell apart at trial in July when his lawyers successfully argued that the prosecution withheld evidence potentially linked to the case.
One of the other prosecutors, Glenn Stevens, left the case in protest that other prosecutors had withheld evidence from the defense. Stevens accused Robert Philibosian, the deputy district attorney on the case, of lying and withholding evidence from the court and defense lawyers in order to keep the Buckeys in jail and prevent access to ...
United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 (1992), was a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning the presentation of exculpatory evidence to a grand jury.It ruled that the federal courts do not have the supervisory power to require prosecutors to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury.
The flurry of misconduct allegations in the Delphi murder case continued this week with new court filings accusing prosecutors and law enforcement of withholding critical information from Richard ...
Cone v. Bell, 556 U.S. 449 (2009), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a defendant was entitled to a hearing to determine whether prosecutors in his 1982 death penalty trial violated his right to due process by withholding exculpatory evidence. [1]
Alec Baldwin’s manslaughter case is finally over. On Monday, special prosecutor Kari Morrissey announced she has withdrawn her appeal of a judge’s order dismissing the case. The decision came ...