enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mapp v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies to states as well as the federal government.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States: 348 U.S. 272 (1955) Federal government did not owe Indian tribe compensation for timber taken from tribal-occupied lands in Alaska under the 5th Amendment: Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. 348 U.S. 426 (1955) definition of taxable income: Williamson v. Lee: 348 U.S. 483 (1955) Due Process Clause, economic ...

  4. Landmark Cases: Historic Supreme Court Decisions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landmark_Cases:_Historic...

    Landmark Cases: Historic Supreme Court Decisions is a series first aired by C-SPAN in the fall of 2015 about 12 key cases argued in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.A second season aired in the winter and spring of 2018, in which 12 additional cases were discussed. [1]

  5. List of landmark court decisions in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    However, states may still ban cross burning with intent to intimidate due to the act’s uniquely hateful history. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93 (2003) Upheld the constitutionality of most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. (Overruled by Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010)) Garcetti v.

  6. Dollree Mapp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollree_Mapp

    Dollree Mapp (October 30, 1923 – October 31, 2014) was the appellant in the Supreme Court case Mapp v. Ohio (1961). She argued that her right to privacy in her home, the Fourth Amendment, was violated by police officers who entered her house with what she thought to be a fake search warrant. [1]

  7. Ohio’s highest court says parent’s rights were not violated ...

    www.aol.com/ohio-highest-court-says-parent...

    Protective services appealed the case, which was then taken up by the Ohio Supreme Court. What does the case law decision say? The ruling, re R.G.M., Slip Opinion No. 2024-Ohio-2737, distinguished ...

  8. Unresolved: Looking back at unsolved cold case murders from ...

    www.aol.com/unresolved-looking-back-unsolved...

    Now, Hudson police hope a partnership with Ohio's new Cold Case Unit will identify her killer through DNA found at the crime scene. Podcast: Unresolved Ep. 1 Beacon Journal package: Questions ...

  9. List of court cases involving the American Civil Liberties ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_court_cases...

    1931 Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359 (1931) - represented Yetta Stromberg; 1932 Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932) - represented the Scottsboro Boys; 1933 United States v.