enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

    Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".

  3. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McIntyre_v._Ohio_Elections...

    The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals, also by a divided vote. The majority of the state supreme court justices felt that the Ohio statute was different from the city ordinance in Talley, finding that section 3599.09(A) "has as its purpose the identification of persons who distribute materials containing false statements". [16]

  4. Issue 1: Ohio Supreme Court orders minor changes to ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/issue-1-ohio-supreme-court-233331252...

    In a 4-3 decision on Monday, the Ohio Supreme Court ordered the Ohio Ballot Board to make some changes, but most of the GOP-written ballot language will remain. The panel must reconvene to fix two ...

  5. Ohio Supreme Court cites grammar rules, overturns Stark ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/ohio-supreme-court-cites-grammar...

    Hartman said the Ohio Supreme Court ruling is final as the case doesn't involve any federal issue that could go to the U.S. Supreme Court. ... Stark County will keep its Dominion voting machines ...

  6. Timeline of voting rights in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_voting_rights...

    Minor v. Happersett goes to the Supreme Court, where it is decided that suffrage is not a right of citizenship and women do not necessarily have the right to vote. [24] 1876. Native Americans are ruled non-citizens and ineligible to vote by the Supreme Court of the United States. [11]

  7. Ohio Senate goes after Supreme Court’s amendment ruling - AOL

    www.aol.com/ohio-senate-goes-supreme-court...

    "The fact that the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Ohio concludes the relevant statute does not grant me authority to review the title does not change my determination that it is ...

  8. Husted v. Randolph Institute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Husted_v._Randolph_Institute

    Ohio law provides a process to remove an inactive voter from its list of registered voters. After a two-year break from certain voting activities specified by Ohio law (i.e., filing a change of address, filing a registration to vote, casting an absentee ballot, casting a provisional ballot, or voting on election day), the State sends these inactive voters a confirmation notice via mail.

  9. COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that residents delivering ballots on behalf of voters with disabilities cannot use drop boxes but instead must go inside the county board ...