Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A researcher's guide to discussion pages. This researcher's guide to discussion pages is intended as an aid to people who are researching with Wikipedia. Experienced Wikipedians often glean a great deal about an article from looking at its discussion page ( a.k.a. "talk page"). This page describes some of these tricks of the trade.
Welcome! There is a simplified version of this page at Help:Introduction to talk pages. Talk pages (also known as discussion pages) are administration pages where editors can discuss improvements to articles or other Wikipedia pages. The talk page associated with an article is named "Talk:Example", where "Example" is the name of the article.
Research. A research question is "a question that a research project sets out to answer". [1] Choosing a research question is an essential element of both quantitative and qualitative research. Investigation will require data collection and analysis, and the methodology for this will vary widely.
The purpose of a page's associated talk page (accessible via the talk or discussion tab) is to provide space for editors to discuss editing that page. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject. When talk pages in other namespaces (including userspace) are used for discussion and ...
The Teahouse is a friendly space for new editors to ask questions with answers from experienced editors. The help desk is the main place for asking questions and also where to turn when all else fails. The village pump is the forum for discussion of Wikipedia's more complex project-wide technical issues, policies, proposals, and operations.
t. e. Wikipedia can be a great tool for learning and researching information. However, as with all tertiary reference works, Wikipedia is not considered to be a reliable source as not everything in Wikipedia is accurate, comprehensive, or unbiased. Wikipedia, like other encyclopedias, is intended to provide an overview of topics and indicate ...
To ask a question or start a discussion about the good article nomination process, click the Add topic link above. Please check and see if your question may already be answered; click the link to the Frequently asked questions below or search the Archives below.
There have been complaints about the perceived backlog in reviewing since the Good article status was created in 2006. Generally speaking, we don't want to restrict nominations along their path to GA. In the beginning, as many as 100 nominations were waiting for a reviewer to volunteer. By 2011, each day typically listed 330 nominated articles ...