Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Pacta sunt servanda [1] ("agreements must be kept.") is a brocard and a fundamental principle of law which holds that treaties or contracts are binding upon the parties that entered into the treaty or contract. [2]
Clausula rebus sic stantibus is the legal doctrine allowing for a contract or a treaty to become inapplicable because of a fundamental change of circumstances. In public international law the doctrine essentially serves an "escape clause" to the general rule of pacta sunt servanda (promises must be kept).
pacta sunt servanda: agreements must be kept: Also "contracts must be honoured". Indicates the binding power of treaties. One of the fundamental rules of international law. palma non sine pulvere: no reward without effort: Also "dare to try"; motto of numerous schools. palmam qui meruit ferat: He who has earned the palm, let him bear it.
Pacta sunt servanda "Agreements are to be kept." Contracts are the law or contracts establish obligations (between those who sign them). Par in parem non habet imperium "Equals have no sovereignty over each other." Prior tempore potior iure "Earlier in time, stronger in right." "The law favors those who establish their rights earlier rather ...
Article 26 defines pacta sunt servanda, that agreements must be kept; Article 53 defines jus cogens, peremptory norm; Article 62 defines Fundamental Change of Circumstance, which determines the validity or invalidity of a treaty; and Article 77 defines depositary, the organisation or person who holds a multilateral treaty.
(The Center Square) – A bill to limit major investors from buying up large numbers of single-family homes got a public hearing in Olympia on Wednesday. Senate Bill 5496, according to a brief ...
Nevertheless, all valid treaties must comply with the legal principle of pacta sunt servanda (Latin: "agreements must be kept"), under which parties are committed to perform their duties and honor their agreements in good faith.
The Hamilton E. James Stock Index From January 2008 to December 2012, if you bought shares in companies when Hamilton E. James joined the board, and sold them when he left, you would have a 41.8 percent return on your investment, compared to a -2.8 percent return from the S&P 500.