Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is the principal set of rules regarding Government procurement in the United States, [1] and is codified at Chapter 1 of Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 48 CFR 1. It covers many of the contracts issued by the US military and NASA, as well as US civilian federal agencies.
Terminations for commercial items (FAR Part 12) contracts are governed by FAR 52.212-4(l) and (m), not the T4C or T4D clauses of FAR 52.249-x. FAR Part 49 prescribes T4D and T4C clauses in FAR Part 52 for non-commercial items (FAR Part 12) related contracts. In particular, T4D is covered by FAR Subpart 49.4, Terminations for Default.
In 1788, the Virginia Ratifying Convention attempted to solve the problem that Hamilton and the Federalists had identified by proposing a constitutional amendment specifying: [10] That those clauses which declare that Congress shall not exercise certain powers be not interpreted in any manner whatsoever to extend the powers of Congress.
Hence, the proposal had the role of appeasing the opponents by allowing Japan's acceptance of the League to be conditional on having a Racial Equality Clause inserted into the covenant of the League. [5] Despite the proposal, Japan itself had racial discrimination policies, especially towards non-Yamato people. [6] [7] [8]
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 11 February 2025. First sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution The Citizenship Clause is the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which was adopted on July 9, 1868, which states: All persons born or naturalized in the United States ...
It was South Carolina's first non-winning season since 2003, and the first of Spurrier's tenure so far. [73] It was Spurrier's first season not going to a bowl game since 1990 , and his first non-winning season in college football since 1987 .
There is some scholarly dispute about whom the clause intended to limit. [10] In England, the "cruel and unusual punishments" clause may have been a limitation on the discretion of judges, requiring them to adhere to precedent. According to the great treatise of the 1760s by William Blackstone entitled Commentaries on the Laws of England:
Maryland: January 10, 1862 [20] [26] (rescinded ratification – April 7, 2014) [27] Illinois : June 2, 1863 [ 28 ] (rescinded ratification – April 4, 2022) [ 29 ] On February 14, 1862, prior to the 1863 ratification of the amendment by the Illinois General Assembly , an Illinois state constitutional convention purported to ratify the Corwin ...