Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A claim is a substantive statement about a thing, such as an idea, event, individual, or belief. Its truth or falsity is open to debate. Its truth or falsity is open to debate. Arguments or beliefs may be offered in support, and criticisms and challenges of affirming contentions may be offered in rebuttal.
Intermediate conclusions or sub-conclusions, where a claim is supported by another claim that is used in turn to support some further claim, i.e. the final conclusion or another intermediate conclusion: In the following diagram, statement 4 is an intermediate conclusion in that it is a conclusion in relation to statement 5 but is a premise in ...
Inductive reasoning also does not provide absolute certainty about positive claims. [19] [10] A negative claim may or may not exist as a counterpoint to a previous claim. A proof of impossibility or an evidence of absence argument are typical methods to fulfill the burden of proof for a negative claim. [10] [22]
[[Category:Philosophy user templates]] to the <includeonly> section at the bottom of that page. Otherwise, add <noinclude>[[Category:Philosophy user templates]]</noinclude> to the end of the template code, making sure it starts on the same line as the code's last character.
Claim may refer to: Claim (legal) Claim of Right Act 1689; Claims-based identity; Claim (philosophy) Land claim; A main contention, see conclusion of law; Patent claim; The assertion of a proposition; see Douglas N. Walton; A right; Sequent, in mathematics; Another term for an advertising slogan. Health claim; A term in contract bridge; king of ...
The relevant question is whether Objectivism is significant enough in the history of philosophy to be included on this template. The template currently includes a subset of the 410 links found at List of philosophies-- less than a quarter of them by my count. So is Objectivism among the top 25% of the most significant philosophies in world ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
According to Chad Meister, professor of philosophy at Bethel University, most philosophers accept Plantinga's free-will defense and thus see the logical problem of evil as having been sufficiently rebutted. [21] Robert Adams says that "it is fair to say that Plantinga has solved this problem.