Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
India supported the charter provisions for a Security Council veto for the great powers, opposed the U.S. initiative to circumvent the veto through the Uniting for Peace Resolution, dismissed Hammarskjöld's notion of a "UN presence" as interventionist and opposed all efforts to conduct UN directed plebiscites as tests of opinion. [16]
These five states are known to have detonated a nuclear explosive before 1 January 1967 and are thus nuclear weapons states under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. They also happen to be the UN Security Council's (UNSC) permanent members with veto power on UNSC resolutions.
The India-Pakistan question (Kashmir conflict and India–Pakistan relations) Soviet Union: 4 November 1956: S/3730/Rev.1: S/PV.754: Letter dated 27 October 1956 from France, the UK and the US to the President of the Security Council concerning the situation in Hungary (Soviet involvement in the Hungarian Revolution of 1956) Soviet Union: 30 ...
India will set up one or more grievance committees to oversee content moderation decisions of social media firms, it said Friday, moving ahead with a proposal that has rattled Meta, Google and ...
All have the power of veto which enables any one of them to prevent the adoption of any "substantive" draft Council resolution, regardless of its level of international support. [ 4 ] The remaining 10 members of the UN Security Council are elected by the General Assembly, giving a total of 15 UN member states on the Security Council, which ...
[52] The "enormous influence of the veto power" has been cited as a cause of the UN's ineffectiveness in preventing and responding to genocide, violence, and human rights violations. [53] Various countries outside the permanent members, such as the Non-Aligned Movement and African Union, have proposed limitations on the veto power. [54]
The executive power to veto legislation is one of the main tools that the executive has in the legislative process, along with the proposal power. [2] It is most commonly found in presidential and semi-presidential systems. [3] In parliamentary systems, the head of state often has either a weak veto power or none at all. [4]
At the conference, H. V. Evatt of the Australian delegation pushed to further restrict the veto power of Security Council permanent members. [21] Due to the fear that rejecting the strong veto would cause the conference's failure, his proposal was defeated twenty votes to ten. [22]