enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. What is a restrictive covenant? And how are they used today ...

    www.aol.com/restrictive-covenant-used-today-nc...

    In real estate, a restrictive covenant is a rule or condition placed on a property that outlines what homeowners can and cannot do with their land. These covenants are legally binding and often ...

  3. California law requiring removal of racial covenants from ...

    www.aol.com/california-law-requiring-removal...

    Every county recorder in California will establish a program to identify and redact unlawfully restrictive covenants from the state’s real The post California law requiring removal of racial ...

  4. Shelley v. Kraemer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelley_v._Kraemer

    Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case that held that racially restrictive housing covenants cannot legally be enforced.. The case arose after an African-American family purchased a house in St. Louis that was subject to a restrictive covenant preventing "people of the Negro or Mongolian Race" from occupying the property.

  5. Covenant (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_(law)

    Outside of England and Wales, the English covenants of title, sometimes included in deeds to real property, are (1) that the grantor is lawfully seized (in fee simple) of the property, (2) that the grantor has the right to convey the property to the grantee, (3) that the property is conveyed without encumbrances (this covenant is frequently ...

  6. NC clash between higher density housing and neighborhood ...

    www.aol.com/nc-clash-between-higher-density...

    “The issue regarding the restrictive covenants is a private matter that the city is not involved in,” said Julia Milstead, the city’s public information officer, in an emailed statement.

  7. Corrigan v. Buckley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrigan_v._Buckley

    Corrigan v. Buckley, 271 U.S. 323 (1926), was a US Supreme Court case in 1926 that ruled that the racially-restrictive covenant of multiple residents on S Street NW, between 18th Street and New Hampshire Avenue, in Washington, DC, was a legally-binding document that made the selling of a house to a black family a void contract. [1]

  8. Hansberry v. Lee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hansberry_v._Lee

    Rejecting that argument, the Illinois state court held that the covenant was enforceable. [1] Years later, a homeowner who had signed the restrictive covenant sold his home to Carl Augustus Hansberry, the father of Lorraine Hansberry. Anna M. Lee, a homeowner, sought to enforce the racially restrictive covenant and void the sale.

  9. What is a restrictive covenant? And how are they used today ...

    www.aol.com/news/restrictive-covenant-used-today...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us