Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Every non-systematic linear code can be transformed into a systematic code with essentially the same properties (i.e., minimum distance). [1] [2] Because of the advantages cited above, linear error-correcting codes are therefore generally implemented as systematic codes.
Non-sampling errors are much harder to quantify than sampling errors. [2] Non-sampling errors in survey estimates can arise from: [3] Coverage errors, such as failure to accurately represent all population units in the sample, or the inability to obtain information about all sample cases; Response errors by respondents due for example to ...
If the users know the amount of the systematic error, they may decide to adjust for it manually rather than having the instrument expensively adjusted to eliminate the error: e.g. in the above example they might manually reduce all the values read by about 4.8%.
Convolutional codes can be systematic and non-systematic: systematic repeats the structure of the message before encoding; non-systematic changes the initial structure; Non-systematic convolutional codes are more popular due to better noise immunity. It relates to the free distance of the convolutional code. [6]
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file
In educational measurement, bias is defined as "Systematic errors in test content, test administration, and/or scoring procedures that can cause some test takers to get either lower or higher scores than their true ability would merit." [16] The source of the bias is irrelevant to the trait the test is intended to measure.
Since sampling is almost always done to estimate population parameters that are unknown, by definition exact measurement of the sampling errors will not be possible; however they can often be estimated, either by general methods such as bootstrapping, or by specific methods incorporating some assumptions (or guesses) regarding the true ...
In linguistics, it is considered important to distinguish errors from mistakes. A distinction is always made between errors and mistakes where the former is defined as resulting from a learner's lack of proper grammatical knowledge, whilst the latter as a failure to use a known system correctly. [9]